Kleber dominates on snow; Firestone fights back where roads are wet but clear.
On paper, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 and the Kleber KRISALP HP3 occupy the same upper-middle winter tyre segment and share nearly identical wheel size ranges — but their characters diverge sharply once the temperature drops. The Winterhawk 4 is a tyre of contradictions: it punches above its weight in wet braking yet frustrates with vague, understeering dry behaviour. The KRISALP HP3, a design that has aged gracefully under Kleber's Michelin Group umbrella, plays a more consistent game — a snow specialist with genuine comfort credentials that has racked up wins across 13 shared tests, finishing ahead of the Firestone in 8 of them. Our rating reflects the gap: 77/100 for the Kleber against 56/100 for the Firestone.
Winterhawk 4
KRISALP HP3


Averaged from 6 tests
Firestone Winterhawk 4
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Firestone Winterhawk 4
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Firestone Winterhawk 4
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Firestone Winterhawk 4
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Firestone Winterhawk 4
Kleber KRISALP HP3Here the Firestone finds its best argument. Across four measured braking tests, it averages 34.7m on wet roads versus 36.5m for the Kleber — a meaningful 1.8m advantage. ADAC 2023 rated it as safe and precise in wet conditions, and its EU wet grip label of B underscores genuine capability. The Kleber, despite scoring well on aquaplaning (85.3 vs the Firestone's 82.8 longitudinally), has attracted recurring wet-road criticism across test seasons, with judges noting limited grip at the limit and a tendency toward understeer on wet tarmac. If you spend most of your winter driving on cold, wet roads rather than snow-covered ones, the Firestone's wet braking edge is a real point in its favour.
Firestone Winterhawk 4
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Firestone Winterhawk 4
Kleber KRISALP HP3Neither tyre will excite you on a dry motorway, but the Kleber handles it with more composure. ADAC 2025 praised the KRISALP HP3 for safe and precise dry-road behaviour, while the Winterhawk 4 drew consistent criticism for spongy, imprecise handling and pronounced understeer — Autobild described it as schwammiges Handling with extended dry braking distances. The Firestone has been flagged for long dry stopping distances across multiple test seasons, and its delayed turn-in response makes it a reactive rather than responsive steer. The Kleber is no sports tyre — it too tends toward understeer when pushed — but it sets a more reassuring baseline for everyday driving.
Firestone Winterhawk 4
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Firestone Winterhawk 4
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Firestone Winterhawk 4
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Firestone Winterhawk 4
Kleber KRISALP HP3Snow is where the KRISALP HP3 earns its reputation. Autobild 2025 called it a straight-up Schneespezialist — the tyre with the shortest snow braking distance and highest traction in that year's test — and the numbers back it up: it averages 28.1m on snow across four tests versus 29.2m for the Winterhawk 4. Its snow braking score of 89.5 and strong scores across snow handling (83.6), snow traction (84), and snow circle cornering (84.9) paint the picture of a tyre built around winter grip. The Firestone is no slouch — ADAC 2025 praised its winter road behaviour and it posts a snow side guide score of 96.5 — but when rankings matter, the Kleber consistently edges it. Owners who have tried the Winterhawk 4 on snowy mountain roads report solid confidence, yet the Kleber's lead in structured testing is clear and repeatable.
Firestone Winterhawk 4
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Firestone Winterhawk 4
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Firestone Winterhawk 4
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Firestone Winterhawk 4
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Firestone Winterhawk 4
Kleber KRISALP HP3The KRISALP HP3 is genuinely quiet — low noise is the single most mentioned positive across 340 customer reviews, cited 11 times, and multiple owners describe it as almost as silent as a summer tyre. Its comfort score of 82.5 and a strong fuel efficiency rating (84.3 in test detail scores) make it an easy long-term companion. The Winterhawk 4 scores a respectable 85.3 for interior noise in isolation but customers with fewer miles to draw on are more divided. The Kleber also holds an edge on rolling resistance — rated C or D on the EU label for the Firestone versus a fuel efficiency score of 84.3 for the Kleber — and its projected mileage under ADAC 2025 was rated as still high, while the Firestone's wear has drawn consistent criticism for being below average.
Firestone Winterhawk 4
Kleber KRISALP HP3
Firestone Winterhawk 4
Kleber KRISALP HP3If you are choosing between these two, the Kleber KRISALP HP3 is the safer all-round bet for the vast majority of drivers. It wins more tests, excels in the conditions that matter most in a real winter, and its owners — 340 ratings strong on Heureka — consistently praise its quietness, comfort, and snow grip for the price. The Firestone Winterhawk 4 makes a more specific case: if your winters are defined by cold rain and slush rather than proper snow, its wet braking advantage (34.7m vs 36.5m averaged across four tests) and decent EU B wet grip rating give it a niche. Its predecessor, the Firestone Winterhawk 3, was a more competitive proposition, and the Winterhawk 4 has struggled to step up convincingly in dry and wear performance. The Kleber is older but still sharp where it counts — a budget-friendly snow specialist that quietly outperforms its price bracket.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs Semperit Speed-Grip 5
Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs Uniroyal WinterExpert
Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs Semperit Speed-Grip 5