Hankook wins all three mutual tests; Firestone punches back with snow traction and size range.
The Firestone Winterhawk 4 and the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 sit in the same upper-middle winter tyre segment, but they arrive from very different directions. Firestone, now a Bridgestone subsidiary, positions the Winterhawk 4 as an accessible winter performer — snow-confident, fuel-efficient, and competitively priced relative to premium rivals. Hankook's W452, by contrast, is a more rounded tyre with stronger all-round scores across dry, wet, and snow disciplines, though it's worth noting it has since been succeeded by the Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3. In three direct encounters, the Hankook came out on top each time — but the margin on wet braking is razor-thin, and the real gap lies elsewhere.
Winterhawk 4
Winter i*cept RS2 W452
Firestone Winterhawk 4Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452Firestone Winterhawk 4Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452Firestone Winterhawk 4Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452Firestone Winterhawk 4Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452Firestone Winterhawk 4Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452On wet roads, the two tyres are strikingly close. Across two measured braking tests, both average just 24.7m (Firestone) versus 24.6m (Hankook) — a difference that is essentially irrelevant in the real world. In the AutoBild 2021 50-tyre group test, the gap was a single tenth of a metre: 33.5m for the Firestone versus 33.4m for the Hankook. The Firestone earns genuine credit here — its aquaplaning resistance has been praised in multiple test seasons, with strong longitudinal figures in particular, and its wet-weather traction on snow-free wet roads is a noted strength. The Hankook's aquaplaning score of 89.7 is exceptional, and its wet handling score of 86 suggests a more composed overall character in the wet, but the braking parity means the Firestone is not outclassed in this discipline.
Firestone Winterhawk 4Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452Firestone Winterhawk 4Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452Dry performance is the Winterhawk 4's most consistent weak point. Testers across multiple seasons have flagged spongy, imprecise handling on dry tarmac, with a pronounced understeer tendency and braking distances that sit below the class average — criticism that has appeared repeatedly from 2023 through 2025. In the Használtautó.hu 2020 comparative test, the Firestone actually stopped marginally shorter on dry (14.4m versus the Hankook's 14.6m), but that single result sits against a broader pattern of dry underperformance. The Hankook W452 carries a dry braking score of 85.4 and a dry handling score of 86.7, reflecting the tighter, more predictable character that real-world testers noted — it behaves with the composed, secure feel that the Firestone only partially delivers.
Firestone Winterhawk 4Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452Firestone Winterhawk 4Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452Firestone Winterhawk 4Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452Firestone Winterhawk 4Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452Snow is where both tyres show their winter credentials most clearly, and both are competitive. In the AutoBild 2021 mutual test, the Hankook edged out the Firestone on snow braking — 28.2m versus 28.6m — a small but consistent margin. The Hankook's overall snow score of 90.1 reflects excellent traction, braking, and handling on packed and loose snow alike, with a lateral aquaplaning score of 88.4 that speaks to its confidence in mixed winter conditions. The Firestone's snow-side guidance score of 96.5 is genuinely remarkable — one of its standout numbers — and testers have called it a snow ace with traction at winter-specialist levels. Firestone markets improved snow acceleration over its predecessor, the Winterhawk 3, which backs up what testers observe. Both tyres are credible winter performers; the Hankook holds a marginal edge in measured braking, but the Firestone's snow traction is hard to fault.
Firestone Winterhawk 4Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452Firestone Winterhawk 4Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452The Winterhawk 4 scores better on rolling resistance within the EU label data, consistent with its manufacturer claim of low fuel consumption — confirmed across multiple ADAC test seasons as a genuine advantage. However, its mileage figures have drawn recurring criticism, with testers noting wear rates that trail the class average. The Hankook W452 carries a rolling resistance score of just 59.5, which is a meaningful efficiency disadvantage, though real owners on Heureka rate it 9.1 out of 10 and frequently cite durability as a strength. Firestone owners rate the Winterhawk 4 at 9.4 out of 10, highlighting good snow performance and value — a BMW and a Mercedes owner both reported satisfaction after early mileage. Interior noise scores are similar for both, with the Firestone scoring 85.3 on interior noise, broadly in line with segment expectations.
Firestone Winterhawk 4Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452Firestone Winterhawk 4Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452In three mutual tests across different test groups and sizes, the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 finished ahead of the Firestone Winterhawk 4 each time, and its broader performance scores reflect a more complete and consistent winter tyre. For drivers who want a well-rounded package — capable on snow, composed in the wet, and predictable on dry roads — the Hankook is the stronger choice on the data. That said, buyers should be aware it has been replaced by the Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3, making the W452 harder to justify at full price unless a significant discount applies. The Firestone Winterhawk 4, with its wider size range covering R14 to R20 and 83 available dimensions, suits drivers who prioritise snow traction and wet safety over dry precision, and who want an accessible price point backed by Bridgestone's manufacturing. Its dry handling limitations are real, but for everyday winter commuting on mixed and snowy roads, it remains a credible budget-to-mid option.
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Autobild | Winter | 2021 | 205/55 R16 | View |
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
VS
VSVSVS
VSVS
VSVSVSVSFirestone Winterhawk 4 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs Semperit Speed-Grip 5
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs Dunlop Winter Sport 5Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs Michelin Alpin 6Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs Continental WinterContact TS 860Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
