Segment
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Gt Radial Fe2 Lowcost
Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Gt Radial Fe2
Table of contents:
| # | Firestone Roadhawk
| Gt Radial Fe2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R21 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this review, we are comparing two tyres; the Firestone Roadhawk and the Gt Radial Fe2. Our team has tested these tyres rigorously to provide an accurate comparison.
Firestone Roadhawk
The Firestone Roadhawk is an interesting proposition. Our rating of this tyre is 59%. According to our tests in collaboration with Autobild, this tyre performed effectively on dry roads and showed exceptional efficiency and minimal wear and tear, securing the 12th position out of 55. However, the Roadhawk model recorded significant shortcomings on wet surfaces, thus indicating an unbalanced performance which led to a lower overall rank in the ADAC's test where it came in the 20th position out of 50. More information about Firestone RoadHawk or visit the Firestone's manufacturer page.
Gt Radial Fe2
On the other hand, the Gt Radial Fe2, a UHP subType, could not score in our rating due to several limitations observed during the tests. The tyre showed uniform good behavior on dry roads and decent efficiency. However, it showed significant weaknesses on wet roads. Autobild's test had it placed at the 19th position out of 55 but ADAC’s test saw it waning at the 22nd position out of 50 due to the worse overall environmental impact and lower durability. Check more about Gt Radial Fe2 or browse the Gt Radial's website.
Verdict
Aggregating the results, in terms of overall performance and positions in mutual tests, the Firestone Roadhawk outperforms GT Radial Fe2 in our comparative tests. The strengths of the Firestone Roadhawk's performance on dry roads and low wear make it a safer bet over the Gt Radial Fe2, which culminated underwhelming performance on wet roads, lousy mileage, and concerns on environmental impact.
Remember that tyre purchase decisions should also consider your driving habits, local climate, and car specifications. Always ensure the tyre's specifications match your vehicle's requirements.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Gt Radial Fe2 11.
Worst position in test
1. Gt Radial Fe2 22.
Average position in tests
2. Gt Radial Fe2 16.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Gt Radial Fe2 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Gt Radial Fe2 Good2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
2. Gt Radial Fe2 68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Gt Radial Fe2 73%
Wet braking
1. Gt Radial Fe2 69%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Gt Radial Fe2 73%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Gt Radial Fe2 74%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Gt Radial Fe2 72%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | |||||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 36,6 | 28,7 | |||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 | 37,4 | 29,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,8 | |||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
