Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 Premium2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Falken (68%). The first tyre test of Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Firmenauto 2021 195/55 R16 test, where both the ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun and the Kinergy eco2 K435 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 70% of Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (65%) of the Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 also have B wet ratings. We also know where ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun is made - Turkey.
# | Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
| Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R13 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 Premium2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Upper-middle
1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Exemplary2. Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 Satisfactory
1. Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 Satisfactory2. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Still recommended
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 8,9 | 8,9 | 8,7 | 10 | 10 | ||
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Satisfactory | 7,0 | 7,8 | 6,9 | 3 | 7 | ||
Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 Rating: Satisfactory | 7,7 | 6,9 | 7,4 | 10 | 10 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 | ||
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 1,8 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 2,2 | ||
Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,4 | 2,4 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 1,7 | ||
Show test details |