Segment
1. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV Upper-middle2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Falken (58%). The first tyre test of Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV was done in 2019, compared to 2020 when was the Firestone Winterhawk 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2021 235/55 R18 test, where both the EUROWINTER HS01 SUV and the Winterhawk 4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Firestone Winterhawk 4 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the EUROWINTER HS01 SUV is made in Turkey and Winterhawk 4 is made in Italy.
# | Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV
| Firestone Winterhawk 4
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R14 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV Upper-middle2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Upper-middle
1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Highly recommended2. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV Satisfactory
1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Satisfactory2. Falken EUROWINTER HS01 SUV Satisfactory
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 386 | 143 | 138 | 118 | |||
Falken EuroWinter HS01 SUV | 309 | 99 | 110 | 100 | |||
Firestone Winterhawk 4 Rating: Highly recommended | 363 | 125 | 123 | 115 | |||
Show test details |