Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Kumho (54%). In this particular case, the Falken Azenis FK520 has a better rating of 82% compared to 48% of the Kumho Ecsta PS91. The first tyre test of Falken Azenis FK520 was done in 2023, compared to 2015 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS91 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the SportAuto 2023 225/40 R18 test, where both the Azenis FK520 and the Ecsta PS91 were tested. See more mutual tests below. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Azenis FK520 is made in Turkey and Ecsta PS91 is made in Korea.
# | Falken Azenis FK520 | Kumho Ecsta PS91 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R18 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
1. Falken Azenis FK520 Highly recommended2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory
1. Falken Azenis FK520 Good -2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended
2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 ? dB
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Good | |||||||
Kumho Ecsta PS91 Rating: Good | |||||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
Kumho Ecsta PS91 | |||||||
Show test details |