Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle2. Star Performer UHP-3 Lowcost
Comparison: Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Star Performer UHP-3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Star). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Star (32%). The first tyre test of Falken Azenis FK510 was done in 2016, compared to 2020 when was the Star Performer UHP-3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 245/40 R19 test, where both the Azenis FK510 and the Performer UHP-3 were tested. We also know where Azenis FK510 is made - Japan/Turkey.
| # | Falken Azenis FK510 | Star Performer UHP-3 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R99 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet side guide
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry lane changing
Dry steering response
Dry driving behavior
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | |||||
| Star Performer UHP-3 Rating: Not recommended | 4- | 3+ | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||