Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Premium2. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Falken Azenis FK510 SUV vs. Michelin Primacy 4+
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Falken (68%). In this particular case, the Michelin Primacy 4+ has a better rating of 76% compared to 67% of the Falken Azenis FK510 SUV. The first tyre test of Falken Azenis FK510 SUV was done in 2020, compared to 2023 when was the Michelin Primacy 4+ first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 57% of Falken Azenis FK510 SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin Primacy 4+ also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Azenis FK510 SUV is made in Japan and Primacy 4+ is made in Spain.
| # | Falken Azenis FK510 SUV
| Michelin Primacy 4+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 4+ Highly recommended2. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Very good -
Worst rating in test
2. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Recommended
