Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle2. Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Switzerland (Esa-Tecar) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Esa-Tecar winter tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro has a better rating of 60% compared to 57% of the Nokian WR Snowproof. The first tyre test of Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro was done in 2020, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2020 235/55 R17 test, where both the Super Grip Pro and the WR Snowproof were tested.
# | Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro | Nokian WR Snowproof | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R20 | ||
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle2. Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro Lowcost
2. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory2. Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory2. Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR Snowproof 69 dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Fuel consumption | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,5 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 1,8 | |
Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,3 | |
Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,7 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,1 |
Show test details |