Segment
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV Premium2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Dunlop) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Dunlop is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Dunlop winter tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV has a better rating of 74% compared to 24% of the Nokian WR SUV 3. The first tyre test of Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR SUV 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the Winter Sport 5 SUV and the WR SUV 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 60% of Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV has B wet grip rating, whereas 80% of Nokian WR SUV 3 has C rating.
# | Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV | Nokian WR SUV 3 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R15 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV Premium2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
2. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended2. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV Highly recommended
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV Recommended
2. Nokian WR SUV 3 ? dB
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 406 | 147 | 134 | 143 | |||
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV Rating: Highly recommended | 389 | 147 | 127 | 115 | |||
Nokian WR SUV 3 Rating: Highly recommended | 390 | 131 | 128 | 131 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 SUV Rating: - | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | ||||
Nokian WR SUV 3 Rating: - | 2 | 2 | 3+ | ||||
Show test details |