14 shops, 56 847 products

|

TheTireLab.com
Vs
Debica Presto Uhp2
Bfgoodrich Advantage

Comparison: Debica Presto UHP2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Debica (58%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich Advantage has a better rating of 66% compared to 47% of the Debica Presto UHP2. The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP2 was done in 2022, compared to 2021 when was the BFGoodrich Advantage first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Presto UHP2 and the Advantage were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Debica Presto UHP2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich Advantage also have A wet ratings.

#	Debica Presto UHP2 /47%	BFGoodrich Advantage /66%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R17 - R18	R14 - R20
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle

2. Debica Presto UHP2 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 146

2. Debica Presto UHP2 4

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 13x

2. Debica Presto UHP2 2x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 8.

2. Debica Presto UHP2 12.

Worst position in test

1. Debica Presto UHP2 17.

2. BFGoodrich Advantage 24.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62

2. Debica Presto UHP2 14.5

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich Advantage 2025

2. Debica Presto UHP2 2022

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich Advantage Good

2. Debica Presto UHP2 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Debica Presto UHP2 Satisfactory

2. BFGoodrich Advantage Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Debica
Presto UHP2

77%

BFGoodrich
Advantage

62%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Debica Presto UHP2 A

2. BFGoodrich Advantage A

Dry

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
Advantage

77%

Debica
Presto UHP2

69%

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
Advantage

64%

Debica
Presto UHP2

63%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich Advantage C

2. Debica Presto UHP2 C

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
Advantage

81%

Debica
Presto UHP2

71%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Debica Presto UHP2 ?

2. BFGoodrich Advantage ? dB

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild

Autobild Summer tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Running costs
Best values in test	1	2+	1+
Debica Presto UHP2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	2	3+
BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Good	2-	2+	2-
Show test details

Autobild

Autobild Summer tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	35,7	27,5
Debica Presto UHP2	36,5	29,8
BFGoodrich Advantage	36,3	31
Show test details