Segment
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost2. Linglong Sport Master Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Presto UHP 2 vs. Linglong Sport Master
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong). Generally, Debica summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Linglong (43%). In this particular case, the Linglong Sport Master has a better rating of 72% compared to 56% of the Debica Presto UHP 2. The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP 2 was done in 2024, compared to 2023 when was the Linglong Sport Master first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Presto UHP 2 and the Sport Master were tested.
| # | Debica Presto UHP 2
| Linglong Sport Master
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R19 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP 2 | 36.4 | 33.1 | |||||
| Linglong Sport Master | 34.2 | 27.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
