Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Debica (58%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 has a better rating of 77% compared to 56% of the Debica Presto UHP 2. The first tyre test of Debica Presto UHP 2 was done in 2024, compared to 2023 when was the Bridgestone Turanza 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2024 215/55 R17 test, where both the Presto UHP 2 and the Turanza 6 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 70% of Debica Presto UHP 2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (79%) of the Bridgestone Turanza 6 also have A wet ratings.
# | Debica Presto UHP 2
| Bridgestone Turanza 6
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R19 | R16 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Lowcost
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory
2. Debica Presto UHP 2 Satisfactory
Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,7 | |||||
Debica Presto UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,6 | |||||
Bridgestone Turanza 6 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,2 | 2,8 | |||||
Show test details |