Segment
1. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle2. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Debica summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Kumho (56%). In this particular case, the Debica Presto HP2 has a better rating of 70% compared to 51% of the Kumho Ecowing ES31. The first tyre test of Debica Presto HP2 was done in 2021, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecowing ES31 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Presto HP2 and the Ecowing ES31 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Debica Presto HP2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (58%) of the Kumho Ecowing ES31 also have B wet ratings.
# | Debica Presto HP2
| Kumho Ecowing ES31
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R13 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle2. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost
2. Debica Presto HP2 12.8
1. Debica Presto HP2 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
1. Debica Presto HP2 Satisfactory2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
1. Debica Presto HP2 70 dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,6 | 2,9 | 1,5 | 2,2 | ||
Kumho Ecowing ES31 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
Show test details |