Segment
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost2. Viking WinTech Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Frigo HP2 vs. Viking WinTech
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Viking). Generally, Viking winter tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Debica (50%). In this particular case, the Viking WinTech has a better rating of 57% compared to 50% of the Debica Frigo HP2. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo HP2 was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Viking WinTech first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the Frigo HP2 and the WinTech were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Debica Frigo HP2
| Viking WinTech
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Debica Frigo HP2 16.132. Viking WinTech 20.83
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Good2. Viking WinTech Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended2. Viking WinTech Conditionally recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Debica Frigo HP2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3+ | 3 | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Viking WinTech Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3+ | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,0 | 30,1 | |||||
| Viking WinTech | 36,0 | 31,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,1 | 26,9 | |||||
| Viking WinTech | 37,1 | 27,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 34,2 | 24,1 | |||||
| Viking WinTech | 35,8 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
