Segment
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Frigo HP2 vs. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen). Generally, Debica winter tyres are slightly better rated (50%) than Nexen (47%). In this particular case, the Debica Frigo HP2 has a better rating of 50% compared to 38% of the Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo HP2 was done in 2018, compared to 2017 when was the Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the Frigo HP2 and the WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Debica Frigo HP2
| Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Debica Frigo HP2 16.13
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Debica Frigo HP2 Good
Worst rating in test
2. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,0 | 30,1 | |||||
| Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 | 37,9 | 31,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,1 | 26,9 | |||||
| Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 | 36,3 | 26,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Debica Frigo HP2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 34,2 | 24,1 | |||||
| Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 WU7 | 33 | 24,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
