Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Debica (50%). The first tyre test of Debica Frigo HP2 was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP51 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Frigo HP2 and the WinterCraft WP51 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 52% of Debica Frigo HP2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 96% of Kumho WinterCraft WP51 has C rating.
# | Debica Frigo HP2
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R13 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
1. Debica Frigo HP2 16.13
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Good2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
Debica Frigo HP2 | 36,6 | 28,1 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 38,8 | 28 | |||||
Show test details |