Segment
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost2. Kormoran SNOW Lowcost
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Poland. Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Debica winter tyres are slightly better rated (50%) than Kormoran (12%). In this particular case, the Debica Frigo HP2 has a better rating of 50% compared to 7% of the Kormoran SNOW. The first tyre test of Debica Frigo HP2 was done in 2018, compared to 2021 when was the Kormoran SNOW first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Frigo HP2 and the SNOW were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 52% of Debica Frigo HP2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Kormoran SNOW has C rating.
# | Debica Frigo HP2
| Kormoran SNOW
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R15 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost2. Kormoran SNOW Lowcost
2. Kormoran SNOW 16.
2. Kormoran SNOW 39.
1. Debica Frigo HP2 16.132. Kormoran SNOW 32.5
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Good
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended
2. Kormoran SNOW 68%
2. Kormoran SNOW 55%
1. Kormoran SNOW 67%
1. Kormoran SNOW 100%
1. Kormoran SNOW 95%
1. Kormoran SNOW 73%
1. Kormoran SNOW 88%
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,1 | 26,9 | |||||
Kormoran Snow | 38,4 | ||||||
Show test details |