Segment
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost2. Imperial SnowDragon UHP Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Frigo HP2 vs. Imperial SnowDragon UHP
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial). Generally, Debica winter tyres are slightly better rated (53%) than Imperial (7%). The first tyre test of Debica Frigo HP2 was done in 2018, compared to 2020 when was the Imperial SnowDragon UHP first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Frigo HP2 and the SnowDragon UHP were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Debica Frigo HP2 | Imperial SnowDragon UHP | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Debica Frigo HP2 16.13
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Debica Frigo HP2 72 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,1 | 26,9 | |||||
| Imperial SnowDragon UHP | 39,1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 101,1 | 103,4 | 102,8 | 100 | |||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 95,66 | 91,8 | 95,8 | 99,4 | |||
| Imperial SnowDragon UHP | 92,1 | 86,9 | 99,2 | 90,2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||