14 shops, 56 847 products

|

TheTireLab.com
Vs
Debica Frigo Hp2
Firestone Winterhawk 3

Comparison: Debica Frigo HP2 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Debica (50%). The first tyre test of Debica Frigo HP2 was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Firestone Winterhawk 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Frigo HP2 and the Winterhawk 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 52% of Debica Frigo HP2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 92% of Firestone Winterhawk 3 has C rating.

#	Debica Frigo HP2 /50%	Firestone Winterhawk 3 /0%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R15 - R18	R13 - R18
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle

2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 64

2. Debica Frigo HP2 25

Number of tests

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 14x

2. Debica Frigo HP2 8x

Best position in test

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 3.

2. Debica Frigo HP2 7.

Worst position in test

1. Debica Frigo HP2 24.

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 32.

Average position in tests

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 16

2. Debica Frigo HP2 16.13

Year of the last test

1. Debica Frigo HP2 2023

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 2020

Best rating in test

1. Debica Frigo HP2 Good

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended

2. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended

Snow

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

85%

Debica
Frigo HP2

78%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Debica
Frigo HP2

78%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

70%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Debica Frigo HP2 B

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 C

Dry

(Overall rating)

Debica
Frigo HP2

84%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

76%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Debica
Frigo HP2

80%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

78%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Debica Frigo HP2 ?

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

83%

Debica
Frigo HP2

80%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Debica Frigo HP2 C

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 E

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Debica Frigo HP2	34,2	24,1
Firestone Winterhawk 3	34,3	25,5
Show test details

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1	1
Debica Frigo HP2 Rating: Good	2-	2	2-	2
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Conditionally recommended	3	3+	2+	2+
Show test details

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Debica Frigo HP2	36,6	28,1
Firestone Winterhawk 3	38,2	27,8
Show test details