Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. CST Medallion MD-A1 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (CST) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than CST (57%). The first tyre test of CST Medallion MD-A1 was done in 2019, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/55 R17 test, where both the Medallion MD-A1 and the PremiumContact 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | CST Medallion MD-A1
| Continental PremiumContact 6
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R15 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. CST Medallion MD-A1 Lowcost
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
CST Medallion MD-A1 Rating: Not recommended | 3- | 2- | 2 | ||||
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
CST Medallion MD-A1 | 38,1 | 34,8 | |||||
Continental PremiumContact 6 | 35,8 | 29,9 | |||||
Show test details |