Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+ Upper-middle
Comparison: Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Cooper) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Cooper (40%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 88% compared to 15% of the Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+. The first tyre test of Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+ was done in 2017, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the WeatherMaster SA2+ and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R22 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good2. Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+ Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended2. Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+ Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,8 | 1,4 | 1,8 | 1,5 | 2,7 | 1,5 |
| Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+ Rating: Sufficient | 2,6 | 3,7 | 2,7 | 2,4 | 2,4 | 2,9 | 3,5 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,7 | 2,4 | 2,1 | 3,4 | 2,5 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+ | 35,9 | 30,2 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 32,1 | 28,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+ Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2 | 3+ | 3+ | 3 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 1- | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+ | 34,6 | 26,1 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 30,3 | 24,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Cooper WeatherMaster SA2+ | 31,9 | 28,3 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 29,2 | 24,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
