Segment
2. Nokian WR A4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Continental WinterContact TS 860S has a better rating of 65% compared to 47% of the Nokian WR A4. The first tyre test of Continental WinterContact TS 860S was done in 2019, compared to 2017 when was the Nokian WR A4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 255/35 R19 test, where both the WinterContact TS 860S and the WR A4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 73% of Continental WinterContact TS 860S has C wet grip rating, whereas 94% of Nokian WR A4 has B rating.
# | Continental WinterContact TS 860S | Nokian WR A4 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R16 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Nokian WR A4 Upper-middle
2. Nokian WR A4 17.
2. Nokian WR A4 9.83
2. Nokian WR A4 Satisfactory
2. Nokian WR A4 Still recommended
1. Nokian WR A4 64%
1. Nokian WR A4 63%
1. Nokian WR A4 65%
2. Nokian WR A4 58%
2. Nokian WR A4 71%
2. Nokian WR A4 73%
2. Nokian WR A4 79%
2. Nokian WR A4 78%
1. Nokian WR A4 72%
1. Nokian WR A4 81%
2. Nokian WR A4 78%
1. Nokian WR A4 83%
1. Nokian WR A4 72%
1. Nokian WR A4 72 dB
1. Nokian WR A4 89%
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
Continental WinterContact TS 860S Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 2+ | ||||
Nokian WR A4 Rating: Not recommended | 4+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
Show test details |