Segment
2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (96%) than Firestone (60%). The first tyre test of Continental WinterContact TS 860 was done in 2016, compared to 2020 when was the Firestone Winterhawk 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 225/50 R17 test, where both the WinterContact TS 860 and the Winterhawk 4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Continental WinterContact TS 860 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Firestone Winterhawk 4 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WinterContact TS 860 is made in Portugal/Slovakia and Winterhawk 4 is made in Italy.
# | Continental WinterContact TS 860
| Firestone Winterhawk 4
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R14 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Upper-middle
1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Highly recommended2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good
2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Satisfactory
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 1,5 | |
Continental WinterContact TS 860 Rating: Satisfactory | 1,9 | 3,0 | 2,1 | 2,2 | 3,0 | 2,5 | |
Firestone Winterhawk 4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,1 | 3,3 | 1,9 | 2,1 | 2,9 | 2,5 | |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on ice | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 13,9 | 14,8 | 16,4 | ||||
Continental WinterContact TS 860 | 15,4 | 16,4 | 21,7 | ||||
Firestone Winterhawk 4 | 14,4 | 15,9 | 25,3 | ||||
Show test details |