Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Kumho (56%). In this particular case, the Continental PremiumContact 6 has a better rating of 78% compared to 51% of the Kumho Ecowing ES31. The first tyre test of Continental PremiumContact 6 was done in 2017, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecowing ES31 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the PremiumContact 6 and the Ecowing ES31 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 84% of Continental PremiumContact 6 has A wet grip rating, whereas 58% of Kumho Ecowing ES31 has B rating. We also know where PremiumContact 6 is made - Slovakia/Germany/Czech Republic.
# | Continental PremiumContact 6
| Kumho Ecowing ES31
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R13 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Upper-middle
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended2. Kumho Ecowing ES31 Satisfactory
Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 1,9 | 2,6 | 2,0 | 1,9 | ||
Kumho Ecowing ES31 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
Show test details |