• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Yokohama (31%). The first tyre test of Continental EcoContact 6 was done in 2020, compared to 2022 when was the Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the EcoContact 6 and the BLUEARTH-GT AE51 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 52% of Continental EcoContact 6 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (93%) of the Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51 also have A wet ratings. We also know where EcoContact 6 is made - Germany.

# Continental EcoContact 6
/63%
Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
/0%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR13 - R22 R14 - R19
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDry
Best values in test146134
Continental EcoContact 6
Rating: Good
101134
Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE51
Rating: Sufficient
91113
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test35,727,5
Continental EcoContact 636,432,7
Yokohama BLUEARTH-GT AE5137,732,2
Show test details