Segment
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Hankook (76%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 has a better rating of 52% compared to 48% of the Continental EcoContact 6. The first tyre test of Continental EcoContact 6 was done in 2020, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2020 235/55 R17 test, where both the EcoContact 6 and the Ventus Prime3 K125 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 50% of Continental EcoContact 6 has B wet grip rating, whereas 72% of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 has A rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the EcoContact 6 is made in Germany and Ventus Prime3 K125 is made in Hungary.
# | Continental EcoContact 6
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R22 | R15 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
Continental EcoContact 6 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,0 | 2,3 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,7 | 2,6 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
Show test details |