Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental CrossContact UHP vs. Nokian Powerproof
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Nokian (62%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 41% of Continental CrossContact UHP has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian Powerproof has A rating.
| # | Continental CrossContact UHP
| Nokian Powerproof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R23 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
