Segment
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium2. Vredestein Quatrac Premium
Comparison: Continental AllSeasonContact vs. Vredestein Quatrac
Table of contents:
| # | Continental AllSeasonContact
| Vredestein Quatrac
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R15 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this text comparison, we will be looking at two popular all-season tyres: the Continental AllSeasonContact and the Vredestein Quatrac. Both tyres have received a 90% rating from our tests, which indicates high quality and performance. The AllSeasonContact is manufactured in Slovakia, Czech Republic, and France, while the Quatrac is produced in Hungary. Neither of these tyres has been replaced by a newer model, so they remain relevant and competitive in the market.
Regarding the Continental AllSeasonContact, its strengths lie primarily in its winter performance, with excellent snow braking and snow cornering abilities. It also excels in wet circle cornering, which is an essential factor for proper handling in wet conditions. Some of its drawbacks include a tendency to understeer and longer stopping distances in dry conditions. Overall, the AllSeasonContact has a good balance of features that make it suitable for various weather conditions. Find more information about the AllSeasonContact and Continental as a tyre manufacturer.
The Vredestein Quatrac has also garnered praise for its well-rounded performance profile. Some of its best features include wet circle cornering, wet handling, dry braking, and overall driver comfort. It has shorter stopping distances on both wet and dry roads and offers a precise and agile driving experience. However, its main drawback is its mediocre tread life. For more information about the Quatrac and Vredestein as a tyre manufacturer, follow the provided links.
In Autobild's 2022 testing of 32 tyres, the Vredestein Quatrac secured the 2nd place, while the Continental AllSeasonContact came in at 8th position. This outcome indicates that the Quatrac may have a slight edge over the AllSeasonContact in terms of overall performance. However, both tyres have strong and weak points that may suit different drivers' preferences and needs.
In summary, both the Continental AllSeasonContact and the Vredestein Quatrac are solid all-season tyre options, with the former excelling in winter performance and the latter offering a well-rounded portfolio for various driving conditions. When choosing between these two tyres, drivers should consider their specific needs and preferences, such as winter performance, wet handling, and tread life. Whether you opt for the AllSeasonContact or the Quatrac, both tyres boast high-quality construction and excellent performance on the road.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Exemplary2. Vredestein Quatrac Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Recommended2. Continental AllSeasonContact Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow cornering
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact | 45,8 | 48,9 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 41,7 | 47,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 3+ | 1- | 3 | |||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 1 | ||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 1- | 1- | |||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | 1 | 1- | 2 | 1 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact | 43 | 48,6 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 40,6 | 46,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: - | 1 | ||||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Recommended | 1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
