Segment
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Continental AllSeasonContact vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3
Table of contents:
| # | Continental AllSeasonContact
| Kleber Quadraxer 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The comparative review focuses on two all-round tyres: the Continental AllSeasonContact and the Kleber Quadraxer 3. Crafted by leading tyre manufacturers Continental and Kleber, these tyres deliver reliable performance across changing weather conditions.
The Continental AllSeasonContact, produced in Slovakia, Czech Republic, and France, scores a rating of 77% on our website. It has solid winter qualities confirmed by Autobild, highlighting its stability in wet handling, short wet braking distances, and low rolling resistance. However, the tyre's downsides include satisfactory performance on dry routes and mediocre aquaplaning features. On Autobild's ranking list, it occupied the 13th position among fifteen tested tyres.
The Kleber Quadraxer 3, manufactured in Poland, outperforms the Continental AllSeasonContact with an overall rating of 87%. Replacing the Kleber Quadraxer 2, this tyre has won praises for its multi-functional capabilities and impressive driving properties on snow and ice, evident in Autobild's test. Its strong points further include short braking ranges on dry surfaces and commendable comfort levels. Its downsides are understeering characteristics on dry and wet tracks. In the same Autobild's test, it came out significantly better, ranking fourth.
Summarizing the data from multiple tests, it can be said that both tyres offer a good balance between performance, safety, and comfort. The Continental AllSeasonContact excels in winter conditions and wet handling but falls short in dry performance and aquaplaning. On the other hand, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 emerged as a more balanced all-rounder with excellent performance on snow, ice, and dry surfaces, but its minor weaknesses lay in understeering tendencies.
In conclusion, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 is deemed to have an edge over the Continental AllSeasonContact when considering overall test performances and ratings. However, the final choice between these two tyres should depend on individual driving conditions, preferences, and specific needs of the customers.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Exemplary2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Continental AllSeasonContact Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow cornering
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact | 45,8 | 48,9 | |||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 | 40,3 | 49,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 3+ | 1- | 3 | |||
| Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
