14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental AllSeasonContact vs. Firestone Multiseason 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

#	Continental AllSeasonContact /83%	Firestone Multiseason 2 /58%

Dimensions	R13 - R20	R13 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

In this text comparison, we will look into two well-known tyres in the market - the Continental AllSeasonContact and the Firestone Multiseason 2. The former is an all-round tyre known for its excellent performance on various terrains, while the latter is a winter tyre designed for optimal grip and stability in cold and icy conditions. Both tyres have been extensively tested and reviewed; let's dive into the strengths, weaknesses, and test results for each.

Starting with the Continental AllSeasonContact, it has an impressive rating of 90% on our website. Manufactured in Slovakia, Czech Republic, and France, it has no predecessor or successor models. According to tests conducted by Autoklub ČR, it secured 2nd position out of 10 tyres, excelling in aquaplaning, dry handling, comfort, and wet circle cornering. In Autobild tests, the tyre ranked 8th out of 32 and shone in snow braking, snow cornering, wet circle cornering, and comfort. Test summary from autobild 2020 praised its all-around performance, excellent winter qualities, and very good price-to-quality ratio.

On the other hand, the Firestone Multiseason 2 has a rating of 79% on our website. Manufactured in Italy, this tyre also has no predecessor or successor models. In Autoklub ČR tests, it secured the 6th position, while in Autobild tests, it ranked even higher at position 6 out of 32 tyres. The Firestone Multiseason 2 excels in price-to-value, snow traction, short wet and snow braking distances, with a high-mileage capacity and low rolling resistance, as per the autobild 2022 test summary.

However, both tyres have some weaknesses as well. The Continental AllSeasonContact was criticized for understeering and long braking distances on dry surfaces, limited mileage, and economy in the autobild 2022 test summary. Meanwhile, the Firestone Multiseason 2 had lower safety reserves for curve aquaplaning and extended dry braking distances.

In conclusion, both the Continental AllSeasonContact and Firestone Multiseason 2 have their strengths and weaknesses. Overall, the Continental AllSeasonContact seems to perform better in tests and offers great all-around performance, while the Firestone Multiseason 2 offers excellent price-to-quality ratio and better performance in some winter conditions. Therefore, the choice between these two largely depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the driver. Be sure to visit the manufacturer websites for Continental and Firestone to gain more insight and make an informed decision.

Segment

1. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 88

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 60

Number of tests

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 26x

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 12x

Best position in test

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 1.

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 6.

Worst position in test

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 13.

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 22.

Average position in tests

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 4.15

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 10.5

Year of the last test

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2024

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 2024

Best rating in test

1. Continental AllSeasonContact Exemplary

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 Good

Worst rating in test

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 Good

2. Continental AllSeasonContact Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
AllSeasonContact

78%

Firestone
Multiseason 2

64%

Wet braking

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 78%

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 74%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 82%

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 63%

Wet handling

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 64%

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 60%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 81%

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 46%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 86%

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 78%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental AllSeasonContact B

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Multiseason 2

72%

Continental
AllSeasonContact

71%

Dry braking

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 69%

2. Continental AllSeasonContact 64%

Dry handling

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 79%

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 76%

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
AllSeasonContact

91%

Firestone
Multiseason 2

82%

Snow handling

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 88%

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 79%

Snow traction

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 86%

2. Continental AllSeasonContact 87%

Snow braking

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 91%

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 87%

Snow cornering

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 95%

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 61%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
AllSeasonContact

79%

Firestone
Multiseason 2

73%

Exterior noise

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 78%

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 76%

Comfort

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 80%

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 70%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 71 dB

2. Continental AllSeasonContact ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Multiseason 2

78%

Continental
AllSeasonContact

64%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 77%

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 71%

Mileage

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 81%

2. Continental AllSeasonContact 65%

Price/value

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 82%

2. Continental AllSeasonContact 51%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental AllSeasonContact B

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 C

Ice

(Overall rating)

Continental
AllSeasonContact

?

Firestone
Multiseason 2

?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autoklub ČR Allyear tyre test 2022 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	102.7	104,8	104,5	102,7
Continental AllSeasonContact	101,8	104,7	101,1	100,6
Firestone Multiseason 2	99,5	100,1	99,6	99,9
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2022 195/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	39,9	44,4
Continental AllSeasonContact	45,8	48,9
Firestone Multiseason 2	45,9	48,9
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2022 195/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1-	1
Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	1-	3
Firestone Multiseason 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2021 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	1-	2+	1	1
Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2+	2+	2
Firestone Multiseason 2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2+	2	2
Show test details