Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Table of contents:
| # | Bridgestone Turanza T005 | Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this comparison, we will take a look at two popular summer tyre models: the Bridgestone Turanza T005 and the Kleber Dynaxer HP4. These tyres have been tested in various situations, and we will summarize their performance based on the test results and provide a verdict on their strengths and weaknesses.
The Bridgestone Turanza T005 is a touring summer tyre made by Bridgestone, one of the world's leading tyre manufacturers. The Turanza T005 has been praised for its overall balanced performance in both dry and wet conditions. In ADAC tests, the tyre ranked 4th out of 17, while in Autobild tests, it achieved 7th place out of 53. The main strengths of this tyre include dry braking, wet braking, wet circle cornering, wet handling, and rolling resistance.
On the other hand, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 is a summer tyre produced by Kleber, a brand known for its reliable and affordable tyres. In ADAC tests, the Dynaxer HP4 ranked 11th out of 17, while in Autobild tests, it achieved 14th place out of 53. The strengths of this tyre are comfort, exterior noise, and fuel efficiency. However, it has been noted for having some weaknesses on wet surfaces.
Comparing the two tyres based on the test results, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 seems to be the better choice overall, with a more balanced performance in various conditions and a higher rating of 89% compared to the Kleber Dynaxer HP4's 78%. The T005 excels in dry and wet braking, handling, and rolling resistance, making it a good option for summer driving in different road conditions. However, it has been noted for slightly increased wear.
On the other hand, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 is a decent option for those prioritizing comfort and low noise levels. The tyre also has good fuel efficiency, which can be an important factor for some drivers. However, it has some weaknesses when it comes to wet performance and slightly increased wear, which could deter some buyers.
In conclusion, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 is the better choice for those looking for a well-rounded tyre with strong performance in various road conditions. The Kleber Dynaxer HP4 can be considered for drivers who prioritize comfort, exterior noise levels, and fuel efficiency above all else. As always, it is essential for consumers to consider their specific driving needs and preferences when choosing the right tyre for their vehicle.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 2,2 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 2,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 1 | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 1,8 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,4 | 31,6 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 31,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | |||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 2,5 | 2,2 | 3,5 | 2,5 | |||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,3 | 2,9 | 2,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||