Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Premium2. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP3
Table of contents:
| # | Bridgestone Turanza T005
| Kleber Dynaxer HP3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R14 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Bridgestone Turanza T005 and Kleber Dynaxer HP3 are two different summer tyres that can be compared based on their performance in various tests. In this analysis, we will consider their test results and identify their strengths and weaknesses, while also determining which tyre is better overall.
Bridgestone Turanza T005 is a touring summer tyre, made in Hungary, Poland, France and Italy, offering an 89% rating according to our data. Bridgestone, a well-known Japanese tyre manufacturer, designed this tyre for improved wet grip, fuel economy and more comfortable rides. This tyre model has not been replaced by a newer version.
On the other hand, the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 is a summer tyre from the French brand Kleber, receiving a 69% rating according to our data. Although there is no subType information available, it is also designed for summer driving conditions. This tyre model has also not been replaced by a newer version.
In the ADAC test, out of a total of 12 tyres, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 ranked 2nd, while the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 ranked 11th. The T005's best features in this test were dry braking and interior noise. In contrast, the Dynaxer HP3 did not have any notable best features in this test.
Meanwhile, in the Autobild test, out of 51 tyres, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 secured the 2nd position, while the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 ranked 18th. The T005's outstanding features from this test were its wet handling capabilities. In comparison, the Dynaxer HP3's best feature was its wet circle cornering performance.
Verdict: Overall, the Bridgestone Turanza T005 outperforms the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 in various test categories, making it the better choice when comparing these two tyres. Its excellent wet handling, dry braking and lower interior noise offer a more comfortable and safer driving experience. On the other hand, the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 is a suitable option for drivers who prioritize wet circle cornering but should consider other options for a more comprehensive tyre performance.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T005 Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Recommended | 2,3 | 1,9 | 2,6 | 2,0 | 1,4 | ||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 2,0 | 1,8 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza T005 | 35,7 | 34,3 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP3 | 39,2 | 37,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
