Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo Premium2. Nexen N blue HD plus Lowcost
Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo vs. Nexen N blue HD plus
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen). Generally, Nexen summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Bridgestone (57%). In this particular case, the Nexen N blue HD plus has a better rating of 46% compared to 22% of the Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Nexen N blue HD plus first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 205/55 R16 test, where both the Turanza T001 Evo and the N blue HD plus were tested.
| # | Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo | Nexen N blue HD plus | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nexen N blue HD plus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 | ||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo Rating: Good | 2,0 | 1,9 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Nexen N blue HD plus Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,2 | 3,0 | 3,0 | 2,4 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||