Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Turanza ER300A vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Kumho (56%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Turanza ER300A has B wet grip rating, whereas 77% of Kumho Ecsta HS52 has A rating.
| # | Bridgestone Turanza ER300A
| Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R16 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
