Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Yokohama (59%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Yokohama W.drive V905 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the W.drive V905 were tested. We also know where Blizzak LM-005 is made - Italy/Hungary/Poland.

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /88%	Yokohama W.drive V905 /0%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R14 - R22	R16 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

/88%

Yokohama W.drive V905

/0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

New comparison

Dimensions

R14 - R22

R16 - R19

Price

Set dimension to see prices

Remove

Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

Best rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

65%

Snow traction

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 77%

Snow braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

Snow handling

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 76%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 72%

Snow cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 75%

Lateral guidance on snow

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 76%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 27%

Snow acceleration

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 94%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 0%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

91%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

69%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 67%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 67%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 67%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
W.drive V905

90%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

83%

Dry braking

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 88%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

Dry handling

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

Dry lane changing

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 100%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

Dry steering response

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 0%

Dry driving behavior

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 80%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

66%

Exterior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 70%

Comfort

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 0%

Interior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 53%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

75%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

73%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 74%

Mileage

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 62%

Price/value

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 79%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

Fuel efficiency

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 78%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

75%

Ice braking

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 78%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 73%

Add to comparison

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	2	2
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Good	2-	2-	2-	2
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands