14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Pirelli Scorpion Winter

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Pirelli (70%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Pirelli Scorpion Winter first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2021 235/55 R18 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the Scorpion Winter were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 54% of Pirelli Scorpion Winter has B rating. We also know where Blizzak LM-005 is made - Italy/Hungary/Poland.

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /88%	Pirelli Scorpion Winter /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R22	R16 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 213

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 8x

Best position in test

1. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

Worst position in test

1. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 8.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 4.25

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 2021

Best rating in test

1. Pirelli Scorpion Winter Exemplary

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. Pirelli Scorpion Winter Satisfactory

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

Snow

(Overall rating)

Pirelli
Scorpion Winter

82%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Snow traction

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 77%

Snow braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 83%

Snow handling

1. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 83%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 72%

Snow cornering

1. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 98%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

Lateral guidance on snow

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 76%

2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 72%

Snow acceleration

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 94%

2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 0%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

91%

Pirelli
Scorpion Winter

78%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 73%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 69%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 85%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 74%

Wet circle cornering

1. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 93%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Pirelli
Scorpion Winter

90%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

83%

Dry braking

1. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 94%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

Dry handling

1. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 96%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

Dry steering response

1. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 100%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

Dry lane changing

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 73%

Dry driving behavior

1. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 91%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Pirelli
Scorpion Winter

75%

Exterior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 77%

Comfort

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 0%

Interior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 63%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 72 dB

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

75%

Pirelli
Scorpion Winter

68%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 76%

Mileage

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 60%

Price/value

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter C

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Pirelli
Scorpion Winter

73%

Ice braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 66%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Pirelli Scorpion Winter 81%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autozeitung Winter tyre test 2021 235/55 R18

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	386	143	138	118
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended	386	143	136	107
Pirelli Scorpion Winter	330	100	133	97
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Pirelli Scorpion Winter

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands