18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6 (2026)

Bridgestone stops 5 metres shorter on wet roads — a gap that defines winter safety.

Comparing the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 and the Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6 is ultimately a comparison between two fundamentally different philosophies: a premium winter tyre engineered around safety-critical performance, and a budget option that keeps purchase costs low at a measurable cost to grip. Bridgestone's Blizzak LM-005 has accumulated an impressive competition record since its launch — multiple test wins across ADAC, AutoBild, AutoMotorSport and others — and is positioned as a wet-road and aquaplaning specialist with strong all-round winter credentials. The Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6, by contrast, earns its appeal through a low purchase price and surprisingly good predicted tread life, but it consistently struggles in the performance categories that matter most for winter safety. Across fourteen shared comparative tests, the Blizzak LM-005 won every single one.

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Good for
Drivers prioritising wet and snow safety Motorway commuters in variable winter conditions Performance car owners wanting winter grip SUV drivers needing R22 fitments
Not ideal for
High-mileage drivers watching cost-per-km Buyers on a tight budget
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
Good for
Budget-conscious drivers in mild winter climates City drivers with limited motorway use Buyers prioritising low purchase price Those wanting high predicted tread life
Not ideal for
Drivers in heavy or frequent snowfall regions Motorway driving in wet winter conditions Those needing fitments above R19 Safety-first buyers who won't compromise on grip

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Maxxis
Premitra Snow WP6
Number of tests
49
20
Best position
#1
#5
Average position
3.2
15.8
Latest test
2024
2025
Available sizes
244
73

These tyres were not tested together. The comparison below is inferred from separate tests by normalizing both tyres against 75 shared benchmark tyres, so treat it as an estimate.

Dry
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
97%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
96%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
97%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
95%
Dry driving behavior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
98%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
100%
Safety
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
99%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
100%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
99%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
95%
Dry handling - objective
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
96%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
97%
Dry lane changing
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
92%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
82%
Dry steering response
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
98%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
99%
Dry Handling Objective
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
99%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
100%

On dry roads the gap is less dramatic than on wet, but the Blizzak LM-005 still holds a clear edge in overall handling balance and precision. Testers consistently describe it as sporting and dynamic, with precise turn-in and good steering feedback — qualities that make it feel composed even in winter conditions. Its one acknowledged weak point is dry braking, where stopping distances are slightly extended compared to the very best in class; this is the trade-off Bridgestone made to optimise wet and snow grip. The Maxxis WP6 has moments of competence on dry surfaces — ADAC awarded it its best category mark in dry conditions in one test cycle — but more recent evaluations flag clear weaknesses in dry road behaviour, with delayed steering response and limited lateral stability noted by multiple test programmes. For drivers who regularly encounter mixed winter conditions, the Blizzak's more complete dry profile represents a meaningful real-world safety margin.

Wet
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
98%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
96%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
98%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
95%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
95%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
99%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
94%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
98%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
99%
Wet handling - objective
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
96%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
99%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
99%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
96%

This is where the gap between these two tyres becomes genuinely significant. The Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 averages 32.1 metres in wet braking across three measured braking tests, against 37.4 metres for the Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6 — a difference of 5.3 metres that represents a full car length at typical urban speeds. In the Autobild 2023 head-to-head across a 54-tyre field, the Blizzak took first place overall while the WP6 finished 34th; the measured braking gap in that test alone was seven metres. Aquaplaning resistance is another Blizzak strength — it consistently earns top marks for both straight-line and crosswind aquaplaning resistance, and this is a pillar of Bridgestone's official positioning for the tyre. The Maxxis shows reasonable aquaplaning scores in individual tests, but wet handling confidence is repeatedly flagged as a weakness, with one test noting significantly extended wet braking distances and limited grip reserves. For winter driving on wet or slushy roads — which describes the majority of European winter conditions — the Bridgestone is in a different league.

Snow
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
94%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
87%
Snow braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
97%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
93%
Snow handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
84%
Snow traction
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
96%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
89%
Snow handling - objective
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
92%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
85%
Lateral guidance on snow
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
69%
Snow cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
92%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
93%
Snow acceleration
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
99%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
96%

On snow, the picture is more nuanced. Measured snow braking distances across two shared tests are nearly identical: the Blizzak LM-005 averages 27.2 metres versus the WP6's 27.7 metres — a difference that is effectively negligible. The Maxxis also shows competitive straight-line snow traction figures. However, beyond straight-line braking, the Blizzak is significantly more capable: testers describe it as fast and agile on snow with easily controllable handling, while the Maxxis is repeatedly penalised for understeer on snow, modest cornering grip, and only adequate snow performance in the corners. The WP6 can handle routine winter commuting in snow, but drivers who encounter more demanding winter terrain — packed snow on mountain approaches or less predictable rural winter roads — will find the Blizzak's superior cornering behaviour and stability provides a meaningful confidence advantage.

Ice
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
97%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
95%
Ice braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
96%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
98%
Ice lateral guidance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
97%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
91%
Comfort
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
96%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
97%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
94%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
97%
Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
98%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
97%
Interior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
96%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
97%

Comfort is one area where the Maxxis is genuinely competitive. Its predicted tread life is among the better results in budget winter testing — ADAC highlighted very high predicted mileage and low abrasion in both 2024 and 2025 testing cycles, which is particularly notable given the WP6's price point. Interior noise is also reasonably well controlled, and some owners report that it rides acceptably for everyday use. The Blizzak LM-005 is, however, the weaker tyre here by the numbers — mileage is consistently flagged as a weakness across testing, with multiple sources noting elevated wear, and its weight is above average for its class. Rolling resistance on the Bridgestone is efficiently managed, contributing to low fuel consumption scores. Real-world WP6 owners tend to focus on value for money as the primary reason for satisfaction, which tells you something about how the tyre positions itself in practice. If you plan to cover high annual mileage and cost-per-kilometre matters, the Maxxis makes a reasonable case — but only on roads where its grip limitations don't become a liability.

Costs
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
92%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
89%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
98%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
80%
Fuel efficiency
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
99%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
96%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
82%
Price/value
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
98%

Performance spider chart

Tread pattern comparison

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Verdict

The Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 wins this comparison comprehensively, and the shared test record — fourteen wins from fourteen meetings — says everything. It is a premium winter tyre that earns its higher price through genuinely superior wet braking, aquaplaning resistance, and all-round winter handling confidence. It has since been succeeded by the Bridgestone Blizzak 6, so buyers should check availability in their size; the LM-005 remains an excellent choice where it can still be found. The Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6 is not without merit — its tread life and noise credentials are genuine positives, and it will serve budget-conscious drivers who mainly deal with light winter conditions and prioritise low running costs. But anyone who regularly drives in genuine winter weather, covers motorway miles in rain, or simply wants the safety margin that a premium tyre provides should choose the Bridgestone without hesitation. The 5.3-metre wet braking gap is not an abstract statistic — it is the difference between a near-miss and a collision.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 14 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2023225/45 R18View
Autoklub ČRAutoklub ČR
Winter
2022225/45 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2022215/55 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2022215/55 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2022245/40 R19View
ADACADAC
Winter
2022185/65 R15View
ADACADAC
Winter
2021225/50 R17View
ADACADAC
Winter
2021195/65 R15View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2021205/55 R16View
Autoklub ČRAutoklub ČR
Winter
2020205/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2020225/40 R18View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2020225/55 R17View
AutoMotorSportAutoMotorSport
Winter
2020225/50 R17View
ADACADAC
Winter
2020205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTireLab.com

GET

TheTireLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.