Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Hankook (83%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 and Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A, the rating is the same - 88%. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2021 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Tyre Reviews 2023 235/60 R18 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A has B rating. We also know where Blizzak LM-005 is made - Italy/Hungary/Poland.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Highly recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
Worst rating in test
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 63 | 64 | 43 | 18 | 8 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended | 60 | 64 | 41 | 18 | 7 | ||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Rating: Recommended | 61 | 62 | 43 | 16 | 5 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | ||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Rating: Good | 2+ | 2- | 2+ | 3+ | 2- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 386 | 143 | 138 | 118 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended | 386 | 143 | 136 | 107 | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A | 327 | 83 | 128 | 116 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
