Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 92% compared to 58% of the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 89% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 has C rating. We also know where Blizzak LM-005 is made - Italy/Hungary/Poland.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R16 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 Still recommended