Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Lowcost
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Giti Gitiwinter W2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (Giti). Giti is a brand that belongs to the GT group. Generally, Giti winter tyres are slightly better rated (50%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 92% compared to 44% of the Giti Gitiwinter W2. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2021 when was the Giti Gitiwinter W2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Sport Auto 2023 225/40 R18 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the winter W2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where Blizzak LM-005 is made - Italy/Hungary/Poland.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | Giti Gitiwinter W2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
Worst rating in test
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow traction
Snow cornering
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry lane changing
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good | |||||||
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Test winner | |||||||
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 2,0 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 3,2 | |||||
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 31,4 | 30,9 | |||||
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 | 37,9 | 31,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 147 | 143 | 147 | ||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended | 145 | 136 | 122 | ||||
| Giti GitiWinter W2 | 85 | 113 | 129 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 32,1 | 28,1 | |||||
| Giti GitiWinter W2 | 38 | 29,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||