14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860S

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (96%) than Bridgestone (93%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 75% of Continental WinterContact TS 860S has C rating. We also know where Blizzak LM-005 is made - Italy/Hungary/Poland.

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /88%	Continental WinterContact TS 860S /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R22	R16 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 97

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 2x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 3.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 4.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 3.5

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 2020

Best rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S Good

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860S Good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860S

75%

Snow braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 82%

Snow traction

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 83%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

Snow handling

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 80%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 72%

Snow cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 69%

Lateral guidance on snow

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 76%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 0%

Snow acceleration

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 94%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 0%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

91%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860S

60%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 57%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 60%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 50%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 62%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 80%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S C

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860S

86%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

83%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 74%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 83%

Dry lane changing

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 72%

Dry steering response

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 100%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

Dry driving behavior

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 0%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Continental
WinterContact TS 860S

74%

Exterior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 77%

Comfort

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 0%

Interior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860S

88%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

75%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 88%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

Mileage

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 0%

Price/value

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S C

Ice

(Overall rating)

Continental
WinterContact TS 860S

89%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Ice braking

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860S 0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860S

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands