Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR Snowproof has a better rating of 57% compared to 37% of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 73% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (86%) of the Nokian WR Snowproof also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Blizzak LM-001 is made in Poland and WR Snowproof is made in Finland/Russian Federation.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | Nokian WR Snowproof | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R21 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry driving behavior
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Price/value
Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof 69 dB