Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Goodride SW601 Lowcost
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Goodride SW601
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Goodride). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Goodride (7%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 and Goodride SW601, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Goodride SW601 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 and the SW601 were tested. We also know where Blizzak LM-001 is made - Poland.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
| Goodride SW601
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R21 | R13 - R15 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 38,5 | 25,9 | |||||
| Goodride SW601 | 38,5 | 29,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
