Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 4
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (50%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 has a better rating of 69% compared to 37% of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 was done in 2015, compared to 2020 when was the Firestone Winterhawk 4 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 73% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Firestone Winterhawk 4 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Blizzak LM-001 is made in Poland and Winterhawk 4 is made in Italy.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | Firestone Winterhawk 4 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R21 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Firestone Winterhawk 4 Satisfactory