18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 (2026)

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than BFGoodrich (75%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Blizzak LM-001 is made in Poland and G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland.

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Number of tests
15
23
Best position
#4
#1
Average position
7.9
6.7
Latest test
2018
2025
Available sizes
147
109

These tyres were not tested together. The comparison below is inferred from separate tests by normalizing both tyres against 9 shared benchmark tyres, so treat it as an estimate.

Dry
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
98%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
95%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
98%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
97%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Dry handling - objective
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
100%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Wet
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
95%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
95%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
94%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
97%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
95%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
97%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Wet handling - objective
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
100%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
97%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
97%
Snow
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
95%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Snow braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
97%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Snow handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
96%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
98%
Snow handling - objective
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
94%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Snow traction
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
94%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Ice
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
95%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Ice braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
95%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Ice lateral guidance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
95%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Comfort
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
99%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
99%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Interior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
99%
Noise/Komfort
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
99%
Costs
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
98%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Price/value
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
100%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
98%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
87%
Fuel efficiency
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
93%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
99%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
100%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
98%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2017225/50 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2017225/50 R17View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTireLab.com

GET

TheTireLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.