Segment
2. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO vs. Michelin Alpin 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO has a better rating of 52% compared to 50% of the Michelin Alpin 5. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Michelin Alpin 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 EVO and the Alpin 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin Alpin 5 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO | Michelin Alpin 5 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Still recommended
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Michelin Alpin 5 ? dB
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2- | 3+ | 2 | |||
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,1 | 2,9 | 2,3 | 3,6 | 1,0 | 1,9 |
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,0 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 3,6 | 1,0 | 2,4 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO | 34,3 | 29,8 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 37,1 | 28,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||