Segment
2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Falken winter tyres are slightly better rated (48%) than Bridgestone (46%). In this particular case, the Falken EuroWinter HS01 has a better rating of 66% compared to 52% of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO was done in 2018, compared to 2017 when was the Falken EuroWinter HS01 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 EVO and the EuroWinter HS01 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO | Falken EuroWinter HS01 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R13 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Satisfactory2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Still recommended2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2- | 3+ | 2 | |||
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2- | 2- | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO | 34,3 | 29,8 | |||||
Falken EuroWinter HS01 | 36,2 | 28 | |||||
Show test details |