Segment
1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost
Comparison: Bridgestone Alenza 001 SUV vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Matador (25%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Alenza 001 SUV and Matador MP92 Sibir Snow, the rating is the same - 0%. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Alenza 001 SUV has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Matador MP92 Sibir Snow has C rating.
| # | Bridgestone Alenza 001 SUV
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R19 - R19 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
