Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Nokian (61%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 84% compared to 46% of the Nokian WR Snowproof. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the WR Snowproof were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (86%) of the Nokian WR Snowproof also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland and WR Snowproof is made in Finland/Russian Federation.

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /84%	Nokian WR Snowproof /46%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R14 - R20
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

/84%

Nokian WR Snowproof

/46%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

New comparison

Dimensions

R14 - R19

R14 - R20

Price

Set dimension to see prices

Remove

Remove from comparison

Segment

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

2. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 59

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 21x

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 14x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 5.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 20.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.19

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 2023

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory

Wet

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

76%

Nokian
WR Snowproof

61%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 65%

Wet braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 71%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 65%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 59%

Wet handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 77%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 54%

Wet circle cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 65%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Nokian WR Snowproof B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR Snowproof

75%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Dry braking

1. Nokian WR Snowproof 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 75%

Dry handling

1. Nokian WR Snowproof 81%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 64%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

94%

Nokian
WR Snowproof

69%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 68%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 96%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 76%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 73%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 61%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

84%

Nokian
WR Snowproof

77%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 77%

Comfort

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 77%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 77%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Nokian WR Snowproof ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR Snowproof

80%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Rolling resistance

1. Nokian WR Snowproof 96%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

Mileage

1. Nokian WR Snowproof 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 75%

Price/value

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 69%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Nokian WR Snowproof C

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR Snowproof

84%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Add to comparison

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	1-	3+	2
Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory	3	2	2-	1-	2+
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2021 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,6	1,9	1,9	2,0	2,6	2,0
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2,6	2,2	1,9	2,5	3,3	2,0
Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory	3,3	2,5	2,3	2,2	2,9	2,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,6	27,9
Nokian WR Snowproof	36,5	29,2
Show test details

ACE Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	200	67	48	60	18	9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Recommended	194	63	42	60	14	9
Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Recommended	179	56	45	47	18	7
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	9,5	8,7	9,9	10	9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Very good	7,0	7,3	9,9	10	8
Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Good	6,4	8,1	6,3	10	7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-	2
Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Good	2-	2-	2+	2-
Show test details

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands